SHA-1 Hash Generator
Generate SHA-1 (160-bit) hashes from text in your browser. Legacy algorithm — SHAttered collision attacks proven in 2017; use SHA-256 for new work.
Note: Hashes are generated client-side. MD5 uses a bundled implementation; SHA uses the Web Crypto API.
About SHA-1 Hash
SHA-1 is a 160-bit cryptographic hash function published by NIST in 1995 (FIPS 180-1). It produces a 40-character hexadecimal digest from any input. This generator computes SHA-1 via your browser's SubtleCrypto API, which still supports SHA-1 despite the algorithm's known weaknesses — unlike MD5, SHA-1 is included because of the large volume of existing code that depends on it. SHA-1 has been cryptographically broken since 2017, when Google and CWI demonstrated the SHAttered attack: two different PDF files producing the same SHA-1 hash, computed for about $110,000 worth of cloud compute. The attack is now affordable to well-resourced adversaries, and newer chosen-prefix variants (SHAmbles, 2020) are cheaper still. Every major TLS certificate authority and code-signing platform has deprecated SHA-1 for new signatures; Git is the largest remaining production use, and even Git is migrating to SHA-256. Legitimate modern uses are narrow: interop with legacy systems that hard-code SHA-1 (older APIs, webhook signatures from GitHub pre-2020), Git object IDs, HMAC-SHA1 in existing code, and computing checksums where collision attacks are out of scope (random duplicate detection, non-adversarial ETags). For new code, use SHA-256 or SHA-512 instead — they're only marginally slower and have no known weaknesses.
Features
- Generate MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256, and SHA-512 hashes
- Hash any text input in real-time
- Compare hash outputs across multiple algorithms
- Copy hash values to clipboard
How to Use
- Enter or paste your text into the input field
- View hash values generated across all algorithms
- Click any hash value to copy it to your clipboard
- Use the hashes for data integrity verification
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is SHA-1 still in browsers if it's broken?
Because too much legacy code depends on it — Git object IDs, old webhook signatures, pre-2017 TLS certificates, HMAC-SHA1 installations. Removing SHA-1 would break the ecosystem. The browser supports it with warnings instead of refusing, unlike MD5.
Can I still use SHA-1 for HMAC?
HMAC-SHA1 is still considered secure today — the HMAC construction is resilient to the collision attacks that broke plain SHA-1. Existing integrations (AWS v4 signing, some webhook signatures) are safe to keep. For new systems, prefer HMAC-SHA256 anyway.
Is SHA-1 faster than SHA-256?
Marginally — about 20–30% faster on general-purpose CPUs. On hardware with SHA extensions (modern Intel and ARM cores have dedicated SHA-256 instructions), SHA-256 is often faster in practice. The speed argument for keeping SHA-1 has mostly evaporated.
What is the SHAttered attack?
A 2017 demonstration by Google and CWI producing two different PDF files with the same SHA-1 hash, using about $110,000 of cloud compute. It proved SHA-1 collisions are affordable to motivated attackers, triggering the deprecation push across TLS CAs, code-signing, and document-signing.
Other Hash Generator variants
MD5 Hash
Generate MD5 hashes from text in your browser. Fast 128-bit checksums for deduplication, ETags, and cache keys — not for security.
SHA-256 Hash
Generate SHA-256 (256-bit) hashes from text in your browser. The modern default for digital signatures, TLS certificates, and Bitcoin addresses.
SHA-512 Hash
Generate SHA-512 (512-bit) hashes from text in your browser. Longer digest than SHA-256, often faster on 64-bit CPUs.